Hardy v. Hardy
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
1Opinion of the Court
— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The stipulation entered into by counsel for the respective parties in open court and thereafter incorporated, but not merged, in the judgment of divorce is enforceable as a contract binding on the parties (CPLR 2104; see Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51; Biener v Hystron Fibers, 78 AD2d 162; Nishman v De Marco, 76 AD2d 360, app dsmd 53 NY2d 642). It unambiguously requires plaintiff, upon defendant’s execution of a deed to the marital premises, to give a bond and mortgage…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
- In Re Estate of FrutigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
- Nishman v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- Biener v. Hystron Fibers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
- In re the Estate of HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by2 opinions
- Furgang v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
- Bouklas v. BouklasNew York Supreme Court · 1986