Legal Opinion

Hardy v. Hardy

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 11, 1983No. Appeal No. 1PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

— Order unanimously modified and, as modified, affirmed, without costs, in accordance with the following memorandum: The stipulation entered into by counsel for the respective parties in open court and thereafter incorporated, but not merged, in the judgment of divorce is enforceable as a contract binding on the parties (CPLR 2104; see Teitelbaum Holdings v Gold, 48 NY2d 51; Biener v Hystron Fibers, 78 AD2d 162; Nishman v De Marco, 76 AD2d 360, app dsmd 53 NY2d 642). It unambiguously requires plaintiff, upon defendant’s execution of a deed to the marital premises, to give a bond and mortgage…

2Cases cited6 opinions

  1. Teitelbaum Holdings, Ltd. v. GoldNew York Court of Appeals · 1979
  2. In Re Estate of FrutigerNew York Court of Appeals · 1971
  3. Nishman v. De MarcoAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  4. Biener v. Hystron Fibers, Inc.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. In re the Estate of HortonAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1976

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Furgang v. EpsteinAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1984
  2. Bouklas v. BouklasNew York Supreme Court · 1986

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API