Legal Opinion

Spence v. University of Delaware

Supreme Court of Delaware

Decided October 18, 1973PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

DUFFY, Justice:

The sole question on this appeal is whether the Industrial Accident Board Second Injury and Contingency Fund (Fund) is obliged to reimburse certain insurance carriers for payments they have made to employees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.

I

These consolidated cases involve claims by two employees (plaintiffs), each of whom sustained successive permanent injuries. Each claimant was totally disabled (by the second such injury) as that term is defined in 19 Del.C. § 2324. 1 Since payments were made to each claimant, the only issue involves ultimate responsibility for them.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
  2. M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
  3. Bigelow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
  4. Magness Construction Company v. WallerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
  2. Nastasi-White, Inc. v. FuttySupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
  3. Workers' Compensation Fund v. Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API