Spence v. University of Delaware
Supreme Court of Delaware
1Opinion of the Court
DUFFY, Justice:
The sole question on this appeal is whether the Industrial Accident Board Second Injury and Contingency Fund (Fund) is obliged to reimburse certain insurance carriers for payments they have made to employees under the Workmen’s Compensation Act.
I
These consolidated cases involve claims by two employees (plaintiffs), each of whom sustained successive permanent injuries. Each claimant was totally disabled (by the second such injury) as that term is defined in 19 Del.C. § 2324. 1 Since payments were made to each claimant, the only issue involves ultimate responsibility for them.…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Air Mod Corporation v. NewtonSupreme Court of Delaware · 1965
- M. A. Hartnett, Inc. v. ColemanSupreme Court of Delaware · 1967
- Bigelow v. Sears, Roebuck & Co.Supreme Court of Delaware · 1969
- Magness Construction Company v. WallerSupreme Court of Delaware · 1970
3Cited by3 opinions
- Price v. All American Engineering CompanySupreme Court of Delaware · 1974
- Nastasi-White, Inc. v. FuttySupreme Court of Delaware · 1986
- Workers' Compensation Fund v. Transport Services, Inc.Supreme Court of Delaware · 2002