Legal Opinion

In re Chandini S.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided October 15, 1990PublishedCited by 12 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an adoption proceeding, the adoptive parents appeal, as limited by their briefs, from much of of a decree of the Surrogate’s Court, Kings County (Bloom, S.), dated January 30, 1990, as, after a nonjury trial, decreed (1) that the consent of the natural father of the subject child born out of wedlock could not be dispensed with, and (2) that the proposed adoption would not be in the best interests of the child.

Ordered that the decree is modified, on the law, by deleting the second decretal paragraph thereof which held that the proposed adoption is not in the child’s best interests; as so…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Bennett v. JeffreysNew York Court of Appeals · 1976
  2. In re Raquel Marie X.New York Court of Appeals · 1990

3Cited by12 opinions

  1. Raymond AA. v. DoeAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1995
  2. Walker v. CampbellIndiana Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. In re Female Infant F. Kurt S.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
  4. In re Kailee CC.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1992
  5. In re St. Vincent's Services, Inc.New York City Family Court · 2007

7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API