Legal Opinion

Imazo Itow v. Nagle

Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit

Decided February 27, 1928No. Nos. 5266, 5267PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

RUDKIN, Circuit Judge.

These are appeals from orders denying applications for writs of habeas corpus. The appellants were ordered deported on the ground that they had been found connected with the management of a house of prostitution and assisting a prostitute. The two cases were heard on a single record before the immigration authorities, and have been submitted to this court on the same briefs.

’ The appellant Itow was the lessee and manager of certain premises in the city of San Jose, Cal., consisting of a pool room and living quarters on the first floor, and a number of rooms occupied by…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. United States ex rel. Diamond v. UhlCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1920
  2. Choy Gum v. BackusCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1915

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Masamichi Ikeda v. BurnettCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1933
  2. Kishan Singh v. District Director of ImmigrationCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1936
  3. Mita v. BonhamCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1928
  4. In re GiacobbiDistrict Court, N.D. New York · 1939
  5. Schenck ex rel. Pate v. WardDistrict Court, D. Massachusetts · 1934

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API