Legal Opinion

State Ex Rel. White v. Robinson

Supreme Court of North Carolina

Decided June 5, 1870PublishedCited by 5 opinions

Exceptions to a report, tried before Logan,at Spring 'Term 1870 of Cabarrus Court. Tire facts are stated in the Opinion. The Commissioners had reported, charging the defendant with the loss; and the Judge overruled his exception to the ^report. The defendant appealed.

1Opinion of the CourtDior, J.

The rules of law laid down in the oases of Cummings v. Mebane, 63 N. C. 315, and Shipp v. Hettrick, Ib. 329, govern this case. In the administration of justice, this Court feels constrained to take judicial notice of the anomalous condition of things which existed during the late war and the transition period which preceded the adoption of our present State government.

In 1861 the rightful government of this State was subverted by a government of paramount force. In the constant changes of revolution, the well established laws of trade commerce and finance were so much deranged that prudence…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Trecothick v. AustinU.S. Circuit Court for the District of Massachusetts · 1825
  2. State Ex Rel . Cummings v. . MebaneSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869
  3. Carr v. . Fearington and OthersSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1869

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Whitford v. FoySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  2. Sudderth v. . McCombsSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1871
  3. Jennings v. . CopelandSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1884
  4. Keener v. . FingerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874
  5. Wells v. . SluderSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1874

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API