Legal Opinion

Kaygreen Realty Co. v. Goldman

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided September 30, 1996PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

In an action for a judgment declaring that the plaintiff was not in default of its lease and that it validly exercised its option to renew the lease, the defendants appeal, as limited by their brief, from so much of an order and judgment (one paper) of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated January 4, 1994, as *683granted the plaintiff’s motion for summary judgment and declared that the plaintiff was not in default of its lease and that it validly exercised its option to renew the lease for the period commencing January 1, 1994.

Ordered that the order and judgment is affirmed,…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Wallace v. 600 Partners Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1995
  2. Tantleff v. TruscelliAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1985
  3. Tantleff v. TruscelliNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
  4. CBS Inc. v. P.A. Building Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1994

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. IG Second Generation Partners, LP v. Kaygreen Realty Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2005
  2. Lawrence v. KennedyNew York Supreme Court · 2011

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API