Legal Opinion

Cone v. Cone

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided December 17, 1902PublishedCited by 3 opinions

Appeal from Muscatine bisii'iet Court. — Hon. W.E. Bran-nan, Judge. This is an action in equity to enforce the specific performance of a contract to convey lands and to confirm and quiet the title to such lands in the plaintiffs. There was a decree in favor of the plaintiffs, granting the relief prayed for. Defendants appeal.

1Opinion of the Court

- Bishop, J.

The plaintiff is the widow of W. L. Gone, who died intestate August 6,1899, and she sues on her own behalf and as guardian of W. Y. Gone and A. E. Gone, minors, and only children of he'self and said W. L. Gone. The defendant Kate L. Gone is the widow of W. D. Gone, *460who died intestate December 1, 3 899. She is the administratrix of the estate of her deceased husband, and is sued in her personal and representative capacity. The said W. L. Oone was an only son of said W. D. and Kate L. Gone, and the defendant Edna Field is an only daughter of the same parties. The defendant Samuel…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. French v. FrenchSupreme Court of Iowa · 1894

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Deckenbach v. DeckenbachOregon Supreme Court · 1913
  2. Mathias v. MathiasSupreme Court of Iowa · 1914
  3. Mohler v. AndrewSupreme Court of Iowa · 1928

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API