Legal Opinion

Bliss v. Young

Court of Appeals of Kansas

Decided March 14, 1898No. 159PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Error from Barton district court; J. PI. Bailey, judge.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Dennison, P. J. :

This action was commenced in the district court of Barton county by the plaintiff in error to recover a judgment against the defendant in error upon a non-negotiable note of $600 and an interest coupon of $21 annexed to and bearing even date with the principal note. The principal note is numbered 6171, and the coupon recites that it is for six months’ interest on $600 loaned, as appears by bond No. 6171. Judgment was rendered for the defendant, and plaintiff brings the case here for review.

The defendant in error alleges that the note,…

2Cited by4 opinions

  1. Dickerson v. HigginsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1905
  2. Seibold v. RubleSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1913
  3. Pittsburg Mortgage Inv. Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916
  4. Pittsburg Mortgage Inv. Co. v. RobinsSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1916

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API