Legal Opinion

Robert E. Mattke v. Mayo Clinic

Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit

Decided July 8, 2004No. 03-2554PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Opinion of the Court

COLLOTON, Circuit Judge.

Robert and Sherry Mattke appeal two decisions of the district court 1 in this diversity case arising out of alleged medical negligence. First, the Mattkes appeal the district court’s adverse grant of judgment as a matter of law on their claim based on the doctrine of res ipsa loquitur. Second, they appeal the district court’s jury instruction prohibiting the jury from basing a finding of negligence on the actions of Mayo Clinic’s pathology department. We affirm.

I

Appellant Robert Mattke was referred to Mayo Clinic in Rochester, Minnesota, by his family physician after…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. Erie Railroad v. TompkinsSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
  2. Reeves v. Sanderson Plumbing Products, Inc.Supreme Court of the United States · 2000
  3. Sorenson v. St. Paul Ramsey Medical CenterSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1990
  4. Warrick v. GironSupreme Court of Minnesota · 1980
  5. Breanne Bennett v. Hidden Valley Golf and Ski, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2003

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Mattke v. DeschampsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API