Legal Opinion

Christoforatos v. City of New York

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided July 30, 2001PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

—In an action to recover damages for personal injuries, etc., the plaintiffs appeal from an order of the Supreme Court, Queens County (Lonschein, J.), dated August 21, 2000, which denied their motion for leave to serve a late notice of claim and dismissed the complaint insofar as asserted against the defendants the City of New York and the City of New York Department of Design and Construction.

Ordered that the order is affirmed, with costs.

In determining whether to grant leave to serve a late notice of claim pursuant to General Municipal Law 50-e (5), a court must consider whether there is a…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Kittredge v. New York City Housing AuthorityAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2000
  2. Acosta v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001
  3. Vandaatselaar v. Town of HempsteadAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2001

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. Klass v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  2. Klass v. City of New YorkAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2013
  3. Quarto v. City of New YorkNew York Supreme Court · 2008

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API