Raymond v. Rapid Express Parcel Delivery of Tampa
District Court of Appeal of Florida
1Opinion of the Court
NIMMONS, Judge.
The claimant challenges the deputy commissioner’s ruling that his claim for workers’ compensation benefits is barred by the statute of limitations. We agree with appellant that the employer/carrier is es-topped from asserting the defense of statute of limitations, and therefore reverse.
Appellant was employed as a delivery driver by Rapid Express Service, a corporation operated by James and Marti Creel-man. Rapid Express Service apparently did not carry workers’ compensation insurance. Shortly before appellant’s accident, Rapid Express Service was purchased by Rapid Express…
2Cases cited7 opinions
- Foster Wheeler Energy Group v. FairhurstDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1981
- Engle v. Deerborne SchoolSupreme Court of Florida · 1969
- Howanitz v. Biscayne Electric, Inc.Supreme Court of Florida · 1962
- Catalano v. Hillsborough County Board of Public InstructionSupreme Court of Florida · 1971
- Southern Culvert Pipe Co. v. OswaltDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1980
2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by1 opinion
- Deere v. SARASOTA COUNTY SCHOOL BD.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 2004