Legal Opinion

Claim of Santo v. Symington Machine Co.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided December 30, 1932PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtRhodes, J.

On November 17, 1925, claimant sustained an injury. The employer paid compensation up to December 23, 1925, and then gave notice that the claim would be controverted. Numerous hearings were had, during which the extent of claimant’s injury was under investigation, and from time to time awards were made to the claimant pending decision as to such disability, which was not classified. Later, the awards now appealed from were made by which it was found that as the result of said injuries claimant has been permanently partially disabled from June 18, 1931, to December 8, 1931. It was further…

2Cited by5 opinions

  1. Matter of Matise v. Munro Waterproofing Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1944
  2. Claim of Croce v. Ford Motor Co.New York Court of Appeals · 1954
  3. Claim of Meisner v. United Parcel ServiceAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1998
  4. Claim of Savino v. PollackAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1969
  5. Claim of Santo v. Symington Machine Co.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1934

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API