Legal Opinion

Pope v. Myers

Court of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976)

Decided March 8, 1927PublishedCited by 5 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion of the Court by

Judge Logan

Reversing.

On the 11th day of March, 1925, the appellant, J. W. Pope, entered into a contract with the appellees, Prank Myers and Naomi Myers, husband and wife, which is in words and figures as follows, to-wit:

“This agreement made and entered into by and between John IV. Pope, party of first part and Pansy and Prank Myers and Naomi Myers his wife1, parties of the second part of Pansy Kentucky.
“Witnesseth: That the party of the first part for and in consideration of '$2,000.00 payable thirty days after settlement of C. B. Pope’s estate hereby agrees to sell and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Boone v. CoeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1913
  2. Smith v. TheobaldCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1887
  3. Brice v. HaysCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1911
  4. Bull v. McCreaCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1848
  5. Dawson v. GoodwinCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1854

3Cited by5 opinions

  1. Stuart-Mcknight Company v. MonroeCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1928
  2. Combs v. JettCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1944
  3. Wheeler v. KeetonCourt of Appeals of Kentucky · 1951
  4. Henry Gray v. Frank StewartKentucky Supreme Court · 2022
  5. Pitek v. McGuireNew Mexico Supreme Court · 1947

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API