Legal Opinion
Navel Orange Administrative Committee v. Exeter Orange Co.
Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit
Decided November 15, 1983No. Nos. 82-4333, 82-4548PublishedCited by 8 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GOODWIN, Circuit Judge.
Navel Orange Administrative Committee (NOAC), created under the Agricultural Marketing Agreement Act of 1937, 7 U.S.C. § 601, et seq., to regulate the market for navel oranges from Arizona and part of California under a marketing order set forth in 7 C.F.R. § 907, et seq., sued Exeter Orange Co. (Exeter) for unpaid assessments levied pursuant to the Act. NOAC prevailed on a motion for summary judgment. Exeter appeals.
In the companion case the United States sought an injunction to require handlers of navel oranges, Valencia oranges, and lemons (Exeter et ai.) to file…
2Cases cited14 opinions
- Landis v. North American Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1936
- Hecht Co. v. BowlesSupreme Court of the United States · 1944
- Herbert v. LandoSupreme Court of the United States · 1979
- United States v. KordelSupreme Court of the United States · 1970
- Shapiro v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1948
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by8 opinions
- United States v. Riverbend Farms, Inc.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1988
- Smith v. DowsonDistrict Court, D. Minnesota · 1994
- United States v. Daylight Dairy Products, Inc.Court of Appeals for the First Circuit · 1987
- Navel Orange Administrative Committee v. Exeter Orange Company, Inc., United States of America v. Exeter Orange Co., Inc., Sequoia Orange Co., Inc., Sequoia Enterprises Inc., Carl A. Pescosolido, Jr., Marvin L. Wilson and Oleah H. Wilson, DefendantsCourt of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1983
- C & W Construction Co. v. Brotherhood of Carpenters & Joiners of AmericaDistrict Court, D. Hawaii · 1985
3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.