Legal Opinion

Ballinger v. Rhees

Missouri Court of Appeals

Decided June 13, 2000No. WD 56830PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

VICTOR C. HOWARD, Judge.

The circuit court denied James A. Bal-linger leave to file a third amended motion *843to modify his child support obligation. Ballinger appeals the circuit court’s denying him permission to file a third amended motion. Because the circuit court did not enter a judgment, we lack jurisdiction and dismiss the appeal.

The record on appeal contains a docket entry from November 24, 1998, which reads: “[Ballinger] by [attorney]. Clay [County] by [attorney]. Motion to dismiss taken up and sustained. JW[.]” On the same day, the following entry reads: “Request to file 3rd [amended]…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. City of St. Louis v. HughesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1997
  2. In the Interest of ProughMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  3. Keck v. KeckMissouri Court of Appeals · 1999
  4. Jenkins & Associates, Inc. v. Quick Electric, Inc.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1998
  5. Rhodus v. McKinleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 1998

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rhodus v. McKinleyMissouri Court of Appeals · 2002
  2. Dieckhoff v. StateMissouri Court of Appeals · 2004

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API