Taylor v. Lusk
Missouri Court of Appeals
Appeal from New Madrid County Circuit Court. — Hon. Sterling H. McCarty, Judge.
1Opinion of the CourtSturgts, J.
We all agree that this case should be reversed and remanded, but for somewhat different reasons. The case was first assigned to Robertson, P. J., and the following statement of facts prepared by him, with some slight modifications, will be adopted.
Plaintiffs’ sawmill, near defendants’ railroad, was destroyed by fire. They sued defendants and obtained a judgment from which defendants have appealed. The trial was to a jury and the defendants submit here that the verdict should have been directed for them and that an instruction given in behalf of plaintiffs which authorized a verdict in their…
Also in this document: Concurrence.
2Cases cited11 opinions
- Grand Trunk Railroad v. RichardsonSupreme Court of the United States · 1876
- Campbell v. Missouri Pacific Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1894
- Field v. New York Central RailroadNew York Court of Appeals · 1865
- Fritz v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern Railway Co.Supreme Court of Missouri · 1912
- Big River Lead Co. v. St. Louis, Iron Mountain & Southern RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1907
6 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by6 opinions
- James Turner & Sons v. Great Northern Railway Co.North Dakota Supreme Court · 1937
- Anderson v. St. Louis-San Francisco Railway Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1963
- Farmers Elevator & Grain Co. v. HinesSupreme Court of Missouri · 1922
- Riggins v. Mo. Pac. R.R. Co.Missouri Court of Appeals · 1921
- Riggins v. Missouri Pacific RailroadMissouri Court of Appeals · 1921
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.