Legal Opinion

State v. Temple

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided June 12, 1899PublishedCited by 2 opinions

On error to Mercer Oyer and Terminer.

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Garrison, J.

The plaintiff in error, an attorney of this-court, was convicted at the May Term, 1898, of the Mercer Oyer and Terminer, of the embezzlement of $70, the moneys of Eosa Lanning, collected by him as her agent.

*376The indictment; was based upon section 272 of the Crimes act. Gen. Btat., p. 1100.

The entire record of the proceedings in the trial court in this case is before this court upon a writ of error, brought up under section 170 of the Criminal Procedure act. Gen. Btat.,p. 1154.

It is not, however, necessary to examine the evidence adduced upon…

2Cited by2 opinions

  1. State v. ReynoldsSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1900
  2. State v. DeutschSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1909

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API