Legal Opinion · Dissent

West Monroe Firefighters Local 1385 v. City of West Monroe

Supreme Court of Louisiana

Decided March 19, 2013No. 2012-C-1937Published

1DissentKnoll, J.

| TWith all due respect, I dissent. The majority interprets La.Rev.Stat. § 33:1992 to exclude the $300 city supplement from first-year firefighters’ “minimum monthly salary” for purposes of calculating the wage differentials of higher-ranking firefighters. In my view, such a narrow interpretation subverts the “remedial and humanitarian ... purpose” of La. Rev. Stat § 33:1991, et seq. New Orleans Firefighters Ass’n v. Civil Serv. Comm’n of City of New Orleans, 422 So.2d 402, 412 (La.1982). I further dissent because I do not believe reading La. Rev. § 33:1992 to include the $300 city supplement…

2Cases cited9 opinions

  1. Pumphrey v. City of New OrleansSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2006
  2. New Orleans, Etc. v. Civ. Service, Etc.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 1982
  3. State v. ShawSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2007
  4. Sultana Corp. v. Jewelers Mut. Ins. Co.Supreme Court of Louisiana · 2003
  5. Oubre v. Louisiana Citizens Fair PlanSupreme Court of Louisiana · 2011

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API