Legal Opinion

State v. Bishop

Washington Supreme Court

Decided March 13, 1958No. 34209PublishedCited by 9 opinions

1Opinion of the CourtWeaver, J.

Appellant was convicted of the crime of burglary in the second degree.

On appeal to this court, he makes two assignments of error: (1) that the court erred when it permitted Manley Olson to testify; and (2) that the court erred when it refused to grant a new trial, because of alleged misconduct of the prosecuting attorney.

When Manley Olson was first called as a witness, the court granted the request of appellant’s counsel that the jury retire. Manley Olson and his mother were examined and cross-examined in the absence of the jury to determine his competency to testify.

RCW 5.60.050 provides, in…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. MoorisonWashington Supreme Court · 1953
  2. Sumerlin v. Department of Labor & IndustriesWashington Supreme Court · 1941
  3. State v. HardungWashington Supreme Court · 1931
  4. State v. AtkinsWashington Supreme Court · 1946

3Cited by9 opinions

  1. State v. GrantCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1973
  2. State v. StammCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1976
  3. State v. FinneganCourt of Appeals of Washington · 1972
  4. State v. CrossCourt of Appeals of Washington · 2010
  5. State v. WyseWashington Supreme Court · 1967

4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API