Legal Opinion

Southwestern National Bank v. Leibowitz

Supreme Court of Pennsylvania

Decided January 6, 1936No. Appeal, 341PublishedCited by 3 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Per Curiam,

Appellant claims to have been an accommodation endorser for her husband. She argues that there is no evidence in the record to show that she received any benefit from the bank for the note she signed. There was sufficient evidence in the record to show that the son acted as the agent for the mother (an illiterate), and that he negotiated with the bank for the transfer of the entire account standing in the name of the husband to her fictitious trade name in return for her assumption of the husband’s debt. This entire transaction cannot be separated from the plan which the husband…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Yeany, ex rel. Gold Standard National Bank v. ShannonSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1917
  2. Bank v. PooreSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1911

3Cited by3 opinions

  1. McKean v. Enburg Et Ux.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 1936
  2. Hart v. StevensCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1940
  3. Logue v. LongSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 1951

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API