Garcia v. State
Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)
1Opinion of the Court
OPINION
DAVID FARRIS, Justice (Assigned).
The appellant, Jose Garcia, stands convicted of Possession of a Deadly Weapon in a Penal Institution. Tex.Pen.Code Ann. § 46.10 (Vernon 1994). On appeal Garcia complains (1) the State’s evidence did not rebut beyond a reasonable doubt his claim to justification by necessity and (2) the trial court erred in failing to instruct the jury on the defense of necessity. We overrule both points of error and affirm the judgment.
Garcia’s conviction was the consequence of a “shank,” a piece of metal sharpened and fashioned into a knife, that he had hidden in his…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- Adelman v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1992
- Hamel v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1996
- Johnson v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1983
- Rivera v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 9th District (Beaumont)1997
3Cited by14 opinions
- McGarity v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
- Short v. StateSupreme Court of Arkansas · 2002
- Darty v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1999
- Daryl Washington v. State, Texas Court of Appeals, 7th District (Amarillo)2004
9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.