Legal Opinion
American Telephone & Utility Consultants, Inc. v. Beth Israel Medical Center
Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York
Decided August 14, 2003PublishedCited by 9 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
Order, Supreme Court, New York County (Charles *835Ramos, J.), entered April 26, 2002, which, to the extent appealed from, granted defendant’s motion to dismiss the cause of action for unjust enrichment, unanimously reversed, on the law, without costs, the motion denied, and the cause of action reinstated.
While the existence of a valid and enforceable contract governing a particular subject matter ordinarily precludes recovery in quasi-contract for events arising out of the same subject matter (Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v Long Is. RR. Co., 70 NY2d 382, 388 [1987]), where there is a bona fide…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Clark-Fitzpatrick, Inc. v. Long Island Rail RoadNew York Court of Appeals · 1987
- Joseph Sternberg, Inc. v. Walber 36th Street AssociatesAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1993
- ME Corp. S.A. v. Cohen Bros.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2002
3Cited by9 opinions
- Poplar Lane Farm LLC v. The Fathers of Our Lady of MercyCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2011
- IIG Capital LLC v. Archipelago, L.L.C.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2007
- Hosking v. TPG Capital Management, L.P. (In re Hellas Telecommunications (Luxembourg) II SCAUnited States Bankruptcy Court, S.D. New York · 2015
- Henry Loheac, P.C. v. Children's Corner Learning CenterAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2008
- Roberts v. 112 Duane Associates LLCAppellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006
4 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.