Legal Opinion

Mahaffey Co. v. Russell & Butler

Mississippi Supreme Court

Decided March 15, 1911PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal from the circuit court of Lauderdale county. Hon. Jno. L. Buckley, Judge. Attachment by Russell & Butler against the Mahaffey Co. et al. Prom a judgment for plaintiffs, defendant appeals. The facts are fully stated in the opinion of the court. The record in this case has been lost and hence no briefs of counsel can be given.

1Opinion of the CourtAnderson, J.

This is an attachment suit, begun in the circuit court ■of Lauderdale county. The appellees were the plaintiffs in the court below, the appellant Mahaffey Company the defendant, and the appellants the Union Bank & Trust Company and the Hamilton National Bank were, respectively, garnishee and claimant. There was a judgment in favor of appellees against the defendant, the garnishee, and the claimant, all of whom appeal to this ■court.

The garnishee the Union Bank & Trust Company, of Meridian, having in its possession funds claimed by Bus-sell & Butler to belong to the Mahaffey Company, was…

2Cases cited1 opinion

  1. White v. RoachMississippi Supreme Court · 1910

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Morris v. MacIoneMississippi Supreme Court · 1989
  2. Valley Bank v. MalcolmArizona Supreme Court · 1922
  3. West Ctr. Apartments Ltd. v. KeyesMississippi Supreme Court · 1979
  4. Jackson v. LeggettMississippi Supreme Court · 1939
  5. Mississippi Cottonseed Products Co. v. Planters' Mfg. Co.Mississippi Supreme Court · 1931

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API