Legal Opinion

McElhaney v. Rouse

Supreme Court of Kansas

Decided June 11, 1966No. 44,494PublishedCited by 24 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

The opinion of the court was delivered by

Kaul, J.:

This is an action for personal injuries brought by plaintiff, L. D. McElhaney, against defendants, Dale G. Wilshire and Dale M. Rouse. The defendant Rouse filed a cross-petition against the plaintiff McElhaney. During the trial a motion for a directed verdict by defendant Wilshire was sustained and he was removed from the case. A verdict was returned against plaintiff McElhaney and also against defendant Rouse on his cross-petition. The trial court overruled the respective motions of both parties for a new trial. Defendant Rouse has appealed…

2Cases cited25 opinions

  1. Grohusky v. Atlas Assurance Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1965
  2. Allen v. EllisSupreme Court of Kansas · 1963
  3. Goodman ex rel. Goodman v. Kansas City, Merriam & Shawnee RailroadSupreme Court of Kansas · 1933
  4. Gibbs v. MikesellSupreme Court of Kansas · 1958
  5. Buchhein v. Atchison, Topeka & Santa Fe Railway Co.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1938

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by24 opinions

  1. Timsah Ex Rel. Timsah v. General Motors Corp.Supreme Court of Kansas · 1979
  2. Kirkendoll v. NeustromCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1967
  3. Howard v. StoughtonSupreme Court of Kansas · 1967
  4. Staudinger v. Sooner Pipe & Supply CorporationSupreme Court of Kansas · 1971
  5. Ziegler v. CrofootSupreme Court of Kansas · 1973

19 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API