Legal Opinion

Cunningham v. State

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided December 19, 1928No. 11865Published

The opinion states the case.

1Opinion

ON MOTION FOR REHEARING.

HAWKINS, Judge.

The first count in the indictment charged theft by a fraudulent taking, the second count charged theft by conversion. Conviction was under the first count, which was tantamount to acquittal of theft by conversion. The foregoing statement becomes pertinent in view of appellant’s renewed insistence that reversible error was committed by the trial court in excluding the statement made by appellant to his father. The count of theft by conversion having been submitted to the jury the excluded statement was probably admissible under authority of Stapleton v.…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Segal v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1924
  2. Stapleton v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1927
  3. Seebold v. StateCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1921
  4. Rumbo v. StateCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1889

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API