Legal Opinion
The Ciano
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided October 7, 1944No. 73, 81, 83, 85, 87 and 89 of 1943PublishedCited by 6 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
GANEY, District Judge.
Six libels in admiralty were filed in the six above entitled cases and the Steamship “Ciano” attached under a writ of attachment. The libels have been filed by six owners of the cargo carried aboard the Ciano from Spain to the United States. The Proctors for the vessel and her owners, filed exceptions to the libels on the ground that this court is without jurisdiction by reason of the following clause contained in the Bill of Lading:
“18. The shippers and receivers, waiving their right to be tried in their home town expressly submit themselves to the jurisdiction of the…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Kelvin Engineering Co. v. BlancoNew York Supreme Court · 1925
- In re Hamburg-American LineNew York Supreme Court · 1930
- The EdamDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1938
3Cited by6 opinions
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
- Shilman v. United StatesDistrict Court, S.D. New York · 1947
- Uniao De Transportadores Para Importacao E Comercio, Ltda. v. Companhia De Navegacao Carregadores AcoreanosDistrict Court, E.D. New York · 1949
- Muoio v. Italian LineDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1964
- The Bremen v. Zapata Off-Shore Co.Supreme Court of the United States · 1972
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.