Legal Opinion

Fajardo v. Boston Scientific Corp.

Supreme Court of Connecticut

Decided December 16, 2021No. SC20455Published

1Opinion of the Court

LESLY FAJARDO ET AL. v. BOSTON SCIENTIFIC CORPORATION ET AL. (SC 20455) Robinson, C. J., and Palmer, D’Auria, Mullins, Kahn and Ecker, Js.* Syllabus Pursuant to this court’s decision in Bifolck v. Philip Morris, Inc. ( 324 Conn. 402), under the risk-utility test, a product is in a defective condition that is unreasonably dangerous to the consumer if (1) a reasonable alternative design that would have avoided or reduced the risk of harm was available and the absence of that alternative design renders the product unreasonably dangerous, or (2) the product is a manifestly unreasonable design in…

2Cases cited44 opinions

  1. Larsen Chelsey Realty Co. v. LarsenSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1995
  2. Champagne v. Raybestos-Manhattan, Inc.Supreme Court of Connecticut · 1989
  3. Mather v. Griffin HospitalSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1988
  4. Martin T. Kosmynka and Christine Kosmynka v. Polaris Industries, Inc., Docket No. 05-3958-CvCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 2006
  5. Logan v. Greenwich Hospital Ass'nSupreme Court of Connecticut · 1983

39 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API