State v. Davis
Supreme Court of North Carolina
1Opinion of the CourtRodmaN, J.
Defendant contends his motion to nonsuit should have been allowed since the State offered no evidence tending to show the record player had a value in excess of $100. His argument is based on this reasoning: Knowingly receiving stolen property is a misdemeanor or a felony dependent on the value of the stolen property, G.S. 14-72; the Superior Court is given exclusive jurisdiction when the property has a value in excess of $100, G.S. 14-73; but the Municipal-County Courts created pursuant to G.S. 7-240 have exclusive jurisdiction of all misdemeanors except minor misdemeanors, with respect to…
2Cases cited4 opinions
- State v. . WhitleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1935
- State v. NormanSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1953
- State v. . DixonSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1908
- State v. . TalleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1930
3Cited by12 opinions
- State v. MillerSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1967
- State v. CooperSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1962
- State v. NormanCourt of Appeals of North Carolina · 2002
- State v. WyattSupreme Court of North Carolina · 1961
- State v. MobleySupreme Court of North Carolina · 1968
7 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.