Legal Opinion

Browning-Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. v. State

New Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division

Decided November 6, 1989PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Per curiam

The judgment of the Tax Court is affirmed substantially for the reasons stated by Judge Lario in his opinion at 10 N.J. Tax 96 (Tax Ct.1988). The record before us discloses that Browning-Ferris Industries did not establish that the work performed on the closure and for which an exemption was sought was for services for the “exclusive” benefit of an exempt organization. N.J.S.A. 54:32B-8.22. The landfill was leased to the appellant by the Township. The appellant operated the landfill as the registered operator with the Department of Environmental Protection and as an independent contractor.…

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Amerada Hess Corp. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1987
  2. Mal Bros. v. Director, Div. of TaxationNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1973
  3. Browning Ferris Industries of South Jersey, Inc. v. StateNew Jersey Tax Court · 1988

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Richard's Auto City, Inc. v. Director, Division of TaxationSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1995
  2. Sodexho Operations, LLC v. Director, Division of TaxationNew Jersey Tax Court · 2003

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API