Legal Opinion

Rolle v. State

District Court of Appeal of Florida

Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-1185PublishedCited by 1 opinion

1Per curiam

Affirmed. See Bruton v. State, 220 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (positive identification by one witness sufficient to support a conviction); Yant v. State, 192 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Vitiello v. State, 169 So.2d 339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).

2Cases cited3 opinions

  1. Bruton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
  2. Yant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
  3. Vitiello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964

3Cited by1 opinion

  1. Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005