Legal Opinion
Rolle v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 1, 1998No. 97-1185PublishedCited by 1 opinion
1Per curiam
Affirmed. See Bruton v. State, 220 So.2d 669 (Fla. 3d DCA 1969) (positive identification by one witness sufficient to support a conviction); Yant v. State, 192 So.2d 297 (Fla. 3d DCA 1966); Vitiello v. State, 169 So.2d 339 (Fla. 3d DCA 1964).
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Bruton v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1969
- Yant v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1966
- Vitiello v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 1964
3Cited by1 opinion
- Rolle v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005