Legal Opinion · Concurring in part, dissenting in part

HOJNOWSKI EX REL. HOJNOWSKI v. Vans Skate Park

Supreme Court of New Jersey

Decided July 17, 2006Published

1Concurring in part, dissenting in partJustice LaVECCHIA

I am in full agreement -with that portion of the majority’s decision that affirms enforcement of the parties’ agreement to subject their dispute to arbitration. I part company from my colleagues, however, in so far as they have chosen to invalidate the waiver of liability that the parties to this appeal executed as a condition of the minor Andrew’s use of defendant’s property to skateboard. In that respect, I am in substantial agreement with the Appellate Division dissent that was penned by Judge Fisher. Essentially, because a waiver of rights of the type entered into by these parties…

2Cases cited21 opinions

  1. Zivich v. Mentor Soccer Club, Inc.Ohio Supreme Court · 1998
  2. Tunkl v. Regents of University of CaliforniaCalifornia Supreme Court · 1963
  3. Sharon v. City of NewtonMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 2002
  4. Dalury v. S-K-I, Ltd.Supreme Court of Vermont · 1995
  5. Kuzmiak v. BrookchesterNew Jersey Superior Court Appellate Division · 1955

16 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API