Legal Opinion
Hankerson v. State
District Court of Appeal of Florida
Decided July 30, 2004No. 5D04-1026PublishedCited by 3 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
879 So.2d 71 (2004)
Horace HANKERSON, Appellant,
v.
STATE of Florida, Appellee.
No. 5D04-1026.
District Court of Appeal of Florida, Fifth District.
July 30, 2004.
Horace Hankerson, Madison, pro se.
Charles J. Crist, Jr., Attorney General, Tallahassee, and Lori N. Hagan, Assistant Attorney General, Daytona Beach for Appellee.
PALMER, J.
Horace Hankerson (defendant) appeals the amended order entered by the trial court denying his rule 3.800(a) motion.[1] Concluding that the trial court lacked jurisdiction to enter the amended order, we vacate that order and dismiss the instant appeal.
The defendant filed…
2Cases cited2 opinions
- Daniels v. StateSupreme Court of Florida · 1998
- Tellas v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2002
3Cited by3 opinions
- Carter v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2006
- Rivera v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2005
- Smith v. StateDistrict Court of Appeal of Florida · 2008