Legal Opinion
ætna Ins. Co. v. Murray
Court of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit
Decided July 20, 1933No. 805PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
McDERMOTT, Circuit Judge.
The defendant below appeals from a judgment rendered on a verdict of a jury in a suit on a fire insurance policy covering a stock of shoes. The fire destroyed part of the stock and damaged the balance. The errors as signed are grouped in the briefs undér four heads.
1. It is contended that the evidence disclosed that plaintiff was not the sole and unconditional owner of the property insured. The only support in the record for this defense is the testimony of plaintiff that he had arranged with two of his employees to pay them for their services a percentage' of the net…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Meehan v. ValentineSupreme Court of the United States · 1892
- Concordia Ins. Co. of Milwaukee v. School Dist. No. 98 of Payne Cty.Supreme Court of the United States · 1931
- Berthold v. GoldsmithSupreme Court of the United States · 1861
- London Assurance Co. v. DrennenSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
- Continental Ins. v. GarrettCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1903
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by16 opinions
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction Company, Burden Ivy Barfield, Bourdon Ray Barfield, and Oliver Eakle Barfield, as Co-Partners Doing Business as Barfield Construction Company v. United States of America for the Use of H. C. Jones, Doing Business as H. C. Jones Construction CompanyCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1957
- Massey v. Farmers Insurance GroupSupreme Court of Oklahoma · 1992
- St. Paul-Mercury Indemnity Co. v. United States ex rel. JonesCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1956
- Grannell v. WakefieldSupreme Court of Kansas · 1952
- Fordyce v. HelveringCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1935
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.