Legal Opinion
United States v. Aurora Natal-Rivera
Court of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit
Decided July 14, 1989No. 88-2462PublishedCited by 16 opinions
1Opinion of the Court
HENLEY, Senior Circuit Judge.
On appeal Aurora Natal-Rivera questions the sentence imposed by the district court 1 following her guilty plea to one count of distribution of cocaine in violation of 21 U.S.C. § 841(a)(2) & (b)(1)(C). We affirm.
On March 15, 1988 a federal grand jury returned a six-count indictment against Natal-Rivera and her paramour Herodes Mur-Orosco charging them with distribution of cocaine and conspiracy to distribute cocaine. Mur-Orosco pleaded guilty to one count of conspiracy to distribute cocaine and inter alia was sentenced to 121 months imprisonment. Natal-Rivera…
2Cases cited3 opinions
- Mistretta v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1989
- United States v. James Lester Valiant A/K/A Lester J. ValiantCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1989
- Robert D. Cummings v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1987
3Cited by16 opinions
- United States v. Eddie Lee GallowayCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1992
- United States v. Ernest R. Streeter, United States of America v. Robert Jay CollinsCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1990
- United States v. Maira Bernice GuzmanCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 2001
- United States v. Damon Rae PrestemonCourt of Appeals for the Eighth Circuit · 1991
- United States of America, Plaintiff-Appellee-Cross-Appellant v. Roger Andrew Talk, A/K/A Roderick Talk, Defendant-Appellant-Cross-AppelleeCourt of Appeals for the Tenth Circuit · 1993
11 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.