State v. Danhauer
Supreme Court of South Carolina
Before Bowman, J., Charleston, Spring term, 1917;. Statement: Carl Dannhauer, having pleaded guilty to indictment charging unlawful storing of alcoholic liquor, and having received sentence of which six months was suspended on condition, was required to show cause why suspended sentence should not become effective. From order that suspended sentence become effective, he appeals.
Read the full summary
Before Bowman, J., Charleston, Spring term, 1917;. Statement: Carl Dannhauer, having pleaded guilty to indictment charging unlawful storing of alcoholic liquor, and having received sentence of which six months was suspended on condition, was required to show cause why suspended sentence should not become effective. From order that suspended sentence become effective, he appeals. Appeal dismissed, and order staying execution of sentence revoked. cites: As to the constitutionality of the Court of General Sessions for Charleston county: Cooley on Constitutional Limitations (4th Ed.), pp.…
1Opinion of the Court
The opinon of the Court was delivered by
Mr. Justice Hydrick.
At the September term, 1915, of the Court of General Sessions for Charleston, appellant pleaded guilty to an indictment which charged him with unlawfully storing alcoholic liquors. The presiding Judge sentenced him to 8 months imprisonment, but suspended 6 months of the sentence on condition that he pay a fine of $100 and refrain from further violations of the liquor laws. He accepted the condition and paid the fine.
At the February term, 1917, upon affidavit showing that the condition had been violated, a rule was issued, requiring…
2Cases cited1 opinion
- State v. MappusSupreme Court of South Carolina · 1917