Legal Opinion

Ex. Parte Newman

Court of Criminal Appeals of Texas

Decided June 26, 1897No. 1296PublishedCited by 25 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HURT, Presiding Judge.

Appellant was charged by indictment with robbery by the use of firearms. The indictment charges a capital offense. Upon the trial below, relator introduced one witness, Lewis, the prosecutor and alleged injured person. This witness failed to identify the relator as one of the parties engaged in the robbery. The names of a number of witnesses were on the back of the indictment. These witnesses were not used by the relator. The testimony of this witness shows that other parties were engaged in the robbery, but that he did not know who they were. The court below refused…

2Cited by25 opinions

  1. State v. KonigsbergSupreme Court of New Jersey · 1960
  2. Ex Parte McDonald, Texas Court of Appeals, 4th District (San Antonio)1993
  3. Ford v. DilleySupreme Court of Iowa · 1916
  4. Ex Parte TownsleyCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1920
  5. Ex Parte DavisCourt of Criminal Appeals of Texas · 1978

20 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API