Legal Opinion

Glaze v. Cleveland (City)

Ohio Court of Appeals

Decided February 27, 1950No. 21705PublishedCited by 2 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

*415OPINION

By DOYLE, J:

This is an action of tort by a passenger upon an electric car operated as a public carrier under the authority and responsibility of the City of Cleveland. The injury for which damages is sought was sustained because of a window in the car falling upon the complainant’s arm.

It appears that the injured lady boarded the car in downtown Cleveland and sat in the rear of it with her arm resting on the frame at the bottom of an open window. After proceeding about forty blocks, the window suddenly dropped upon and injured her arm. A fellow passenger then raised the window from her…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. Faulkner v. Boston & Maine RailroadMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1905
  2. Boucher v. Boston & Maine RailroadSupreme Court of New Hampshire · 1911
  3. Chadwick v. Louisville & Nashville RailroadCourt of Appeals of Kentucky (pre-1976) · 1926
  4. Murphy v. Boston Elevated Railway Co.Massachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1918

3Cited by2 opinions

  1. Rigney v. Cincinnati Street Railway Co.Ohio Court of Appeals · 1954
  2. Hudson v. BennettOhio Court of Appeals · 1952

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API