Legal Opinion

Dixon v. Cole

Supreme Court of Georgia

Decided November 17, 2003No. S03A0880PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

Benham, Justice.

Appellant Wilma Jean Botts Dixon and all the appellees individually own 19 lots of what they believed was lakefront property in a subdivision on Lake Blue Ridge in Fannin County. The descriptions of the property in the deeds conveying the lots put the waterfront boundary at the 1,700-foot contour line. Due to concerns about the ownership of the area below the 1,700-foot contour line (Lake Blue Ridge’s maximum flood level purportedly being at the 1,690-foot contour line), the grantors of the lots executed a number of quitclaim deeds purporting to transfer to the individual lot…

2Cases cited7 opinions

  1. Pickett v. PaineSupreme Court of Georgia · 1973
  2. Capote v. RaySupreme Court of Georgia · 2002
  3. Hall v. TrubeySupreme Court of Georgia · 1998
  4. Dismuke v. StynchcombeSupreme Court of Georgia · 1976
  5. Hanson v. WilsonSupreme Court of Georgia · 1987

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. Artson, LLC v. HudsonCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  2. Wright v. Safari Club InternationalCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2010
  3. Parsons v. MertzCourt of Appeals of Georgia · 2013
  4. Wilcher v. Way Acceptance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012
  5. Jay Wilcher v. Way Acceptance Co.Court of Appeals of Georgia · 2012

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API