Legal Opinion · Dissent

In re Tatiana N.

Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York

Decided April 8, 2010Published

1Dissent

Andrias, J.P.

(dissenting in part).

Although I agree with the majority that there is legally sufficient evidence to support a finding that appellant was guilty of committing acts that, if committed by an adult, would constitute the crimes of assault in the third degree, attempted assault *193in the third degree, menacing in the third degree and endangering the welfare of a child, I believe that, viewing the record in the light most favorable to the presentment agency (see Matter of David H., 69 NY2d 792, 793 [1987]), the evidence is legally insufficient to support a finding that the appellant,…

2Cases cited8 opinions

  1. People v. ChiddickNew York Court of Appeals · 2007
  2. Matter of H.New York Court of Appeals · 1987
  3. People v. AcostaNew York Court of Appeals · 1993
  4. In re Myacutta A.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 1980
  5. In re Julissa R.Appellate Division of the Supreme Court of the State of New York · 2006

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API