Legal Opinion

City of Ft. Pierce v. Scofield Engineering Co.

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided April 14, 1932No. 6346PublishedCited by 7 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

HUTCHESON, Circuit Judge.

The city of Fort Pierce comes here complaining of the action of the District Court in overruling its demurrer to plaintiff’s declaration, and in thereafter denying its motion for a directed verdict. As to the declaration and the proof the same insufficien-cies are relied on. These are: That though the suit is OTie upon contract against a municipality, the declaration does not allege, por does the proof show, the existence of those prerequisites to a valid contract which the city charter makes mandatory — that the ■contract was countersigned by the city clerk, that it…

2Cases cited14 opinions

  1. Roberts v. City of FargoNorth Dakota Supreme Court · 1901
  2. Travelers Insurance v. Village of WadsworthOhio Supreme Court · 1924
  3. Municipal Securities Corp. v. Kansas CitySupreme Court of Missouri · 1915
  4. Frick v. City of Los AngelesCalifornia Supreme Court · 1896
  5. Empire Voting Mach. Co. v. City of ChicagoCourt of Appeals for the Seventh Circuit · 1920

9 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

3Cited by7 opinions

  1. Keeran v. SalleyCourt of Appeals of Texas · 1951
  2. Providence & Worcester Co. v. Blue Ribbon Beef Co.Supreme Court of Rhode Island · 1983
  3. Orbit Construction Co. v. Trail Development Corp.District Court of Appeal of Florida · 1967
  4. Whalen v. City of AtlantaDistrict Court, N.D. Georgia · 1982
  5. Scofield Engineering Co. v. City of DanvilleCourt of Appeals for the Fourth Circuit · 1942

2 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API