Legal Opinion

Richard Carter Newman v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director of Florida Division of Corrections

Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit

Decided July 31, 1972No. 71-1548PublishedCited by 6 opinions

1Per curiam

By his habeas corpus petition Newman contends that his death sentence for rape should be set aside because the voir dire examination of the jury panel was not recorded, thus foreclosing to him proof that prospective jurors might have been excused in violation of the precepts of Witherspoon v. Illinois, 1968, 391 U.S. 510, 88 S.Ct. 1770, 20 L.Ed.2d 776. Secondly, he urges that the imposition of the death penalty amounts to cruel and unusual punishment in violation of the Eighth Amendment.

The intervening decision in Furman v. Georgia, 1972, 408 U.S. 238, 92 S.Ct. 2726, 33 L.Ed.2d 346 and its…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Furman v. GeorgiaSupreme Court of the United States · 1972
  2. Witherspoon v. IllinoisSupreme Court of the United States · 1968

3Cited by6 opinions

  1. William E. Baker v. Louie L. Wainwright, Director, Division of CorrectionsCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1976
  2. Gerald Eaton v. Walter Capps, WardenCourt of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1973
  3. Cherry v. State of TexasDistrict Court, N.D. Texas · 1973
  4. United States ex rel. Patrick v. RussellDistrict Court, E.D. Pennsylvania · 1973
  5. Philip G. Yates v. C. E. Breazeale, Superintendent of the Mississippi State Penitentiary, No.24792Court of Appeals for the Fifth Circuit · 1972

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API