Legal Opinion
Goldman v. Rhode Island Ins.
District Court, E.D. Pennsylvania
Decided September 28, 1951No. 335 of 1947Published
1Opinion of the Court
BARD, District Judge.
This is an action in admiralty by a retail shoe store operator against an insurance company for damages to a shipment of shoes from Argentina, which damages were allegedly caused by a risk covered by insurance. On the basis of the pleadings and the testimony, I make the following special
*197Findings of Fact.
1. Libellant is Myer Goldman, the operator of a retail shoe store in Wilmington, Delaware. Libellant has been engaged in this business for over thirty years.
2. In March or April 1946 libellant ordered 636 pairs of women’s calfskin and snede shoes from Cormons Company of…
2Cases cited6 opinions
- Lanasa Fruit Steamship & Importing Co. v. Universal InsuranceSupreme Court of the United States · 1938
- Fireman's Fund Ins. v. Globe Nav. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1916
- Western Assur. Co. of Toronto v. ShawCourt of Appeals for the Third Circuit · 1926
- Soelberg v. Western Assur. Co.Court of Appeals for the Ninth Circuit · 1902
- Baker Castor Oil Co. v. Insurance Co.District Court, S.D. New York · 1944
1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.