Legal Opinion

Estate of Narischkine v. Commissioner

United States Tax Court

Decided June 12, 1950No. Docket No. 20115PublishedCited by 20 opinions

Receipt of arrears of periodic alimony by estate of a deceased divorced wife held includible in gross income of the estate. Sec. 126, I. R. C.

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION.

Aeundell, Judge:

Tbe novel, if narrow, issue for decision here is whether tbe estate of the deceased divorced wife must include in its gross income an amount received as arrearages of periodic alimony payments due her.

Section 126 (a) (1) (A) of tbe Internal Bevenue Code provides:

SEO. 126. INCOME IN RESPECT OE DECEDENTS.(a) Inclusion in Gross Income. — -(1) * * * items of gross income in respect of a decedent which are not properly includible in respect of tbe taxable period in which falls the date of his death or a prior period shall be included in the gross income, for the taxable…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Gale v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1949
  2. O'Daniel v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1948

3Cited by20 opinions

  1. Grant v. Commissioner of Internal RevenueCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1953
  2. Grant v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1952
  3. Holahan v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1954
  4. Reighley v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1951
  5. Kitch v. CommissionerUnited States Tax Court · 1995

15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API