Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Resto, A.
Supreme Court of Pennsylvania
1Opinion of the CourtChief Justice Saylor
In this appeal, the Court considers whether a mandatory minimum sentencing provision that does not require proof of any aggravating fact violates the Sixth Amendment per Alleyne v. United States , 570 U.S. 99 , 133 S.Ct. 2151 , 186 L.Ed.2d 314 (2013).
At a jury trial, Appellee was convicted of, among other offenses, rape of a child. See 18 Pa.C.S. § 3121(c). At sentencing, the common pleas court implemented the mandatory minimum sentence for that offense per Section 9718(a)(3) of the Sentencing Code, which, in relevant part, prescribes as follows:
A person convicted of the following offenses…
2Cases cited15 opinions
- Almendarez-Torres v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1998
- Alleyne v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 2013
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Hopkins, K.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2015
- Commonwealth v. ValentineSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2014
- Commonwealth, Aplt. v. Wolfe, M.Supreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2016
10 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.
3Cited by20 opinions
- Commonwealth v. KaneSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Commonwealth v. GolsonSuperior Court of Pennsylvania · 2018
- Smith, R. v. Wells, A.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
- Allegheny Reprod. Health v. PA DHSSupreme Court of Pennsylvania · 2024
- Com. v. Barger, M.Superior Court of Pennsylvania · 2019
15 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.