Legal Opinion

Spradling v. Rural Fire Protection Company

Court of Appeals of Arizona

Decided May 1, 1975No. 1 CA-CIV 2260PublishedCited by 4 opinions

1Opinion of the Court

OPINION

WREN, Judge.

This appeal raises the question as to whether a “motion to reconsider” extends the time for filing an appeal under Rule 73(b), Rules of Civil Procedure, 16 A.R.S. We believe it does not, and that appellant’s appeal must therefore be dismissed for lack of jurisdiction.

On February 16, 1972, appellant, Gale Spradling (Spradling), brought a wrongful death action against appellee, Rural Fire Protection Company (Rural). The complaint alleged negligent failure to equip with safety belts, a fire truck from which her husband was thrown when it collided with a car.

Rural moved to…

2Cases cited2 opinions

  1. Reidy v. O'Malley Lumber CompanyArizona Supreme Court · 1962
  2. Arizona State Liquor Board v. SlonskyArizona Supreme Court · 1970

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Ray Korte Chevrolet v. SimmonsCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  2. Hegel v. O'Malley Ins. Co., Inc., Agents & Brkrs.Arizona Supreme Court · 1977
  3. Matter of Estate of BalcombCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1977
  4. Spradling v. Rural Fire Protection CompanyCourt of Appeals of Arizona · 1975

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API