Hon v. Commonwealth
Kentucky Supreme Court
1Opinion of the Court
STEPHENS, Chief Justice.
The basic issue we decide on this appeal is whether the Commonwealth, in a persistent felony offender prosecution, must affirmatively prove that the defendant was at least eighteen years old when the previous crime(s) were committed. We answer this question in the affirmative and reverse the judgment of the trial court.
Ronnie K. Hori was convicted of two counts of first degree burglary and was sentenced to twenty years imprisonment on each count. He was tried as a second degree persistent felony offender and received an enhanced sentence of one hundred years in prison.…
2Cases cited5 opinions
- Burks v. United StatesSupreme Court of the United States · 1978
- Hobbs v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1983
- Crawley v. KunzmanKentucky Supreme Court · 1979
- Kendricks v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
- Adams v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1977
3Cited by39 opinions
- Montgomery v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1991
- Garcia H. Simpson v. Emitt L. SparkmanCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1996
- Wilson v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1985
- Smith v. CommonwealthKentucky Supreme Court · 1987
- Gene M. Dunn, Jr. v. Ron Simmons, Chairman, Parole Board, Corrections Cabinet, and David L. ArmstrongCourt of Appeals for the Sixth Circuit · 1989
34 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.