Legal Opinion

Penrod v. Cupp

Oregon Supreme Court

Decided November 29, 1978No. TC 96355, CA 7282, SC 25615; TC 98593, CA 8561, SC 25616PublishedCited by 8 opinions

1Per curiam

Petitioners in these habeas corpus cases, Penrod v. Cupp and Brown v. Cupp, 283 Or 21, 581 P2d 934 (1978), were represented by counsel appointed by the circuit court for Marion County. The court also appointed counsel to represent petitioners on appeal. They now move this court for an order awarding attorney fees for counsel’s services on petition for review in this court. The petition for attorney fees does not specify to whom the order should be directed or from what funds the fees should be paid. Because the legal authority for the requested award of attorney fees seemed doubtful, we…

2Cases cited4 opinions

  1. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  2. Penrod v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1978
  3. State v. JamisonOregon Supreme Court · 1968
  4. Bekins v. CuppOregon Supreme Court · 1976

3Cited by8 opinions

  1. State Ex Rel. Scott v. RoperSupreme Court of Missouri · 1985
  2. State Ex Rel. Juvenile Department v. GrannisCourt of Appeals of Oregon · 1984
  3. Application of RobertsOregon Supreme Court · 1981
  4. Beaupierre v. Julien IndustriousSupreme Court of The Virgin Islands · 1983
  5. State ex rel. Roby v. MasonOregon Supreme Court · 1978

3 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API