Legal Opinion

De Graff v. St. Paul & Pacific Railroad

Supreme Court of Minnesota

Decided October 16, 1876PublishedCited by 6 opinions

Appeal by plaintiffs, partners as De Graff & Co., from an order of the court of common pleas of Ramsey county, Bimons, J., presiding, sustaining a demurrer to the complaint. *

1Opinion of the Court

Berry, J.1

Sp. Laws 1874, c. 105, provides (§1) that “ no lands now held * * * by the state to aid in the construction of the lines of railroad from Watab to Brainerd, and from St. Cloud to St. Vincent, or either of said lines, as now authorized to be constructed by the St. Paul & Pacific Railroad Company, for those portions of said railroads now ready for rolling-stock, shall be conveyed, certified over, or otherwise transferred by the state, or any of its officers, to the said railroad company, its successors- or assigns, until payment is made of all debts and demands, due to citizens of…

2Cited by6 opinions

  1. Mardis v. McCarthyCalifornia Supreme Court · 1912
  2. Carolina Spruce Co. v. Black Mountain R.Tennessee Supreme Court · 1917
  3. Louisiana & A. Ry. Co. v. State Board of AppraisersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  4. New Orleans Great Northern R. v. State Board of AppraisersSupreme Court of Louisiana · 1914
  5. Township of Hamtramck v. Rapid Railway Co.Michigan Supreme Court · 1899

1 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API