Legal Opinion

Richards v. Marshman

Supreme Court of Iowa

Decided June 15, 1849Published

Error to Yarn, Burén District Court.

1Opinion of the Court

Opinion by

GbeeNE, J.

Assumpsit on four promissory notes made by the defendant and others, payable to Silas Tolman and by him indorsed and delivered to Seth Richards. The notes are dated Sept. 27th, 1842, payable on or before the 28th day of June, 1843; and drawn to bear interest at the rate of twenty per 'cent, per annum after due till paid. Pleas, non assumpsit and usury.

On the trial, there was evidence given tending to sustain the plea of usury, and to show that Osse Tolman, one of the makers of the notes, borrowed money of the plaintiff and gave him surety notes drawing interest at the rate…

2Cases cited17 opinions

  1. President of the Bank of the United States v. OwensSupreme Court of the United States · 1829
  2. Bibb v. ReidSupreme Court of Alabama · 1841
  3. Bank of the Metropolis v. JonesSupreme Court of the United States · 1834
  4. Fox v. WhitneyMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1819
  5. Warren v. MerryMassachusetts Supreme Judicial Court · 1807

12 more not listed; retrieve them via the Exa API.

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API