Legal Opinion

United States v. Park

Court of Customs and Patent Appeals

Decided May 29, 1913No. 1039PublishedCited by 4 opinions

Appeal from Board of United States General Appraisers, Abstract 29824 (T. D. 32830).

1Opinion of the Court

Barber, Judge,

delivered tbe opinion of the court:

The merchandise involved in this case is commonly called night lights. The appraiser reported it to be “short, thick candles com- . posed of cotton wick, illuminant material, not wax, and metal/' returned the same for duty as tapers at 35 per cent ad valorem under paragraph 436 of the tariff act of 1909, and it was so assessed by the collector. ■

The record certified here, after reciting the application on behalf of the United States for an appeal to, and the order of, this court, directing the sending up of the record, evidence, exhibits, and…

2Cases cited5 opinions

  1. Continental Insurance v. RhoadsSupreme Court of the United States · 1886
  2. Settlemier v. SullivanSupreme Court of the United States · 1879
  3. New York, Lake Erie & Western Railroad v. PennsylvaniaSupreme Court of the United States · 1895
  4. United States v. LoebCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1901
  5. Thomas Prosser & Son v. United StatesCourt of Appeals for the Second Circuit · 1907

3Cited by4 opinions

  1. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  2. United States v. SaundersCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1914
  3. Geo. S. Bush & Co. v. United StatesUnited States Customs Court · 1949
  4. Veolay, Inc. v. United StatesCourt of Customs and Patent Appeals · 1933

Showing a preview — retrieve the full document via the Exa API.

Powered by the Exa API